The name Parkland came from the land on which the hospital was built, originally purchased by the city as a park. ![]() The original hospital opened on May 19, 1894, in a wooden building on a 17-acre (6.9 ha) meadow located at Oak Lawn Avenue and Maple. Of course, Apple just spent 15 years opposed to the idea of a full desktop/notebook OS on a tablet, but they also went back on their own pro apps, phablets, the stylus, intel, displays, network gear, cross-compatibility of all kinds, and privacy, so at this point, it’s clear nothing is precious. It works just fine on a wacom touchscreen display, even if it means this trillion dollar company needs to invent precision mode or the magnifier like it’s still 20 years ago. And to anyone still clinging to “but notebook software wouldn’t work with ur fingertips”, it’s too late, cat’s out of the bag. That’s how you beat the Surface, not with BS ads. They’d have desktops, notebooks, and tablets aboe to run the same full-featured applications on the “pro” level, and more pared down, entry-level versions of the same hardware array for everyone else. Not only would that make sense of the “pro” designation, it would fill the MS Surface-shaped gap in the product line and eliminate redundancy. The “iPad Pro” line should really be a portable/touch extension of MacOS. The basic “iPad” line as it is now, a medium screen/keybd/pencil-ready extension of iPhone’s mobile iOS. ![]() Ideally, the ipad line would be split in twain: They‘ve been pretty transparent at least saying they have no plans for MacOS on the iPad so any time you buy a iPad Pro from them you are buying it knowing full well its overpowered for what it is and you are essentially getting a larger screen and things running a tad bit faster and that’s about it. Its really disappointing but at this point we just need to accept it. They squeeze people into buying the larger screen because the Pro model is the only one that has it. If Apple made a 12.9” iPad Air, the sales of the iPad Pro would be nonexistent for the most part. I would gather that there is a large percentage of people who buy 12.9” iPad Pro simply because of the larger screen. Lower end models do everything the Pro models do.Īpple is also smart about it. Its much easier for them to just have ALL of the iPads running the exact same software instead of giving the Pro Models their own software. I honestly think the main reason is that Apple doesn’t want to make the effort to splinter the software. And that in the mobile space only IOS and Android survived, any other OS has been rejected because developing for a third platform is a lot more work (if you can achieve the largest number of people with the minimum number of platforms that's the most efficient) and probably only the announcement that Rosetta will be discontinued will push a lot of developers to make their apps universal. Also most softwares have not even been made native for M1, which is way easier that porting to iPad. (because it's easy to learn to develop for only one platfom.). ![]() Never overestimate the fact that most companies would rather develop and maintain software for one platform or as few as possible.Ĭoncerning the last point, remember that a ton of apps are not available on Mac and some Mac software is Mac only. Developing for iPad means (re)designing the interface for touch, which is not necessary on MacOS and Windows and can be a lot of work People have grown used to pay much less for mobile software Apple takes a 30% cut on mobile software, contrary to desktop Mobile systems have historically been under-powered (until early last year the maximum RAM in iPad was 4GB, except for the very niche 1TB 2018 iPad pro) You don't give examples, but I'll give you a few reasons.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |